4 ms·
You're right, I was thinking about RTTI there, and wrong phrasing for vtables (should have said to avoid the virtual keyword and dynamic binding).
by stevenhuang 8y ago
You're right, I was thinking about RTTI there, and wrong phrasing for vtables (should have said to avoid the virtual keyword and dynamic binding).
- monocasa 8y agoI mean, even virtual dispatch is fine if you opt in to it. Pointer indirection costs way less relatively on embedded systems than big boy systems with DRAM and caches.