That is why they call it pointless style sometimes. Point free is good for short functions, like 1-3 compositions is fine (maybe little more), but if you overu

That is why they call it pointless style sometimes. Point free is good for short functions, like 1-3 compositions is fine (maybe little more), but if you overuse it, it's actually much less flexible and you have to rewrite more code if you want to change something. "Point-free style can (clearly) lead to Obfuscation when used unwisely. As higher-order functions are chained together, it can become harder to mentally infer the types of expressions. The mental cues to an expression's type (explicit function arguments, and the number of arguments) go missing. Point-free style often times leads to code which is difficult to modify. A function written in a pointfree style may have to be radically changed to make minor changes in functionality. This is because the function becomes more complicated than a composition of lambdas and other functions, and compositions must be changed to application for a pointful function. Perhaps these are why pointfree style is sometimes (often?) referred to as pointless style. " https://wiki.haskell.org/Pointfree https://wiki.haskell.org/Pointfree