3 ms·
Well, for something extraterrestrial that has been sent to our system billions of years ago by an advanced civilization that cannot really be understood by huma
by ygra 8y ago
Well, for something extraterrestrial that has been sent to our system billions of years ago by an advanced civilization that cannot really be understood by humans, I guess artistic license is okay. The human stuff still works with mostly realistic physics (with the Epstein drive the main exception, which is needed to actually enable the world).
- kyriakos 8y agoAnd even with the epstein drive they still show acceleration and deceleration changing at the mid point of the journey. They don't have inertial dumpers like star trek invented to work around the issue.
- akvadrako 8y agoWhat do you mean? It's not like the ships "stop" when the drive is turned off.
- Robin_Message 8y agoIt's implied they generate gravity on the ships by burning the engines* and the engines seem to burn all the time, so you can assume for half of every trip they are accelerating towards destination and the other half they are decelerating again. Orbital mechanics seems to only apply when convenient, e.g. an orbital mirror around a moon is damaged and "falls" straight down. I don't think that is accurate, even assuming the loss of atation-keeping thrust. * Not real gravity, but you can't tell the difference between gravity and acceleration. And they also account for high-G manoveurs being difficult/deadly for humans.
- akvadrako 8y agoAh, I thought he was giving an argument why the Epstein drive was unrealistic, since his tone was agreeing with the parent.