I expect Mozilla to do a much better job at educating the public on the pros and cons on a complex topic like this. Seems like they're just blindly taking a sid

I expect Mozilla to do a much better job at educating the public on the pros and cons on a complex topic like this. Seems like they're just blindly taking a side. I expect Mozilla has a team of Lawyers who should all be able to speak intelligently on the topic. So where are they? Mozilla tell me... - Why does classifying internet as Title 2 make sense? - Why is the Sherman Act (1890) not adequate for preventing ISPs from picking winners? - Why do we want ISP to have to apply for broadcasting licenses and thus giving the government the power to shut down content without court order?