3 ms·
That's why people are downvoting this guy? I totally agree that there's a more privacy-respecting solution. I was asking why people were downvoting this commen
by greglindahl 8y ago
That's why people are downvoting this guy?
I totally agree that there's a more privacy-respecting solution. I was asking why people were downvoting this comment.
- matthewmacleod 8y agoBecause it fundamentally misses the point. Nobody objects to testing newborns for diseases. That’s awesome. Keep doing it. We all support that program, so there’s not much point in telling us how good it is. Almost entirely unrelated to that is the storage of samples after they’re taken. That’s the actual problem, and solving it has not effect on the first issue there.
- jasonlotito 8y agoWhile I hate getting meta and discussing voting in HN comments, the best thing to do in the future is instead of asking why votes are going in one direction or another, instead, either vote yourself, or if it calls for it, offer up on-topic commentary. Comments that stir good on-topic discussion should never be down voted, regardless of whether you disagree with them or not, or even if they are missing a point. Down voting a comment like the parents is, at best, insulting the very premise of good HN discussions.
- greglindahl 8y agoI hate getting meta, too, and I almost always vote up instead of commenting. In this case I'm pretty disappointed by the replies I got to my question.
- thankthunk 8y agoBecause the guy was justifying taking and keeping the DNA material for perpetuity with his anecdote. It's the quintessential example of authoritarianism defense. One instance of good justifies authoritarianism and violation of individual liberties and freedom.