3 ms·
Anyone knows why nobody is using "AI" to test those websites. I suppose a few heuristics and some sort of recognition of state machines would suffice to be abl
by dmichulke 8y ago
Anyone knows why nobody is using "AI" to test those websites.
I suppose a few heuristics and some sort of recognition of state machines would suffice to be able to test 80% of all sites.
- wukerplank 8y agoSince they are doing user testing, what would be the value of AI? Unless AI is the target audience of your service, you'd gain very little insight.
- dmichulke 8y agoWell, I'm assuming of course that you can find many mistakes much faster with "robot testing", so it'd be cheaper. Of course you wouldn't find "semantic" mistakes.
- Joe8Bit 8y agoThis kind of testing isn't about that kind quantative, QA type testing; it's about qualitative feedback, for example: - "We have these wireframes of this new major feature, let's get a group of people from our target demographics in a room and have them react to it and give us early feedback" - "We think we have an idea for a new product for managing widgets, so we want to talk to professional widget managers about how they currently manage their widgets; and test our hypothesis that this is a better way of doing it" As the previous poster pointed out, this is something that isn't easily or readily generalisable into AI.
- sodosopa 8y agoThis isn't SQA testing, it's testing and validating human interaction with the user interface. You can't automate that (yet). You need human users