I have yet to see ML phds at my university (a well reputed ML institute ) care for Nature. Everyone publishes in journals specific to their area. * Nips, icml,

I have yet to see ML phds at my university (a well reputed ML institute ) care for Nature. Everyone publishes in journals specific to their area. * Nips, icml, iclr for all ML folk * Cvpr, iccv for vision * Nacl for nlp * Siggraph for graphics So on and so forth. I wonder how nature finds reviewers for ML papers , given its generic nature. Even ML researchers themselves have been struggling to give good reviews in the aforementioned top conferences. I can't imagine how the reviewers at Nature could appropriately review papers of the same quality.