The more dismissive/reductive/binary you are about a complicated issue with wide ranges of perspectives, the more obligated you are to back it up with analysis.

The more dismissive/reductive/binary you are about a complicated issue with wide ranges of perspectives, the more obligated you are to back it up with analysis. Otherwise it just comes across as BS, which is probably why you're getting downvoted. It's like, write big checks all you want, but if they're not backed by anything, they'll bounce. The solution is to either (metaphorically) put more money in the bank, or (metaphorically) just write smaller checks.