4 ms·
>They've filed court cases against the FCC. They're activly trying to change legislation. Of course... they have to spend the donations on something. Anything
by ghba66 8y ago
>They've filed court cases against the FCC. They're activly trying to change legislation.
Of course... they have to spend the donations on something. Anything but improving Firefox or Thunderbird, lol
>An ISP zero rating facebook, Netflix or Spotify just entrenches a big player in their dominant position.
No because in the EU by legislation ISPs are forced to zero-rate all services in the same category. If they zero-rate Netflix they have to zero-rate YouTube and everything in between.
>LOL. So a company can't stand for anything because they might upset someone?
Exactly. They should not alienate possible users or customers.
>Have a bit of self awareness. Having a persecution complex when you're on the winning side is pathetic.
I, and all customers, are on the winning side by now. But we have to keep fighting so evil doesn't win, :)
- KozmoNau7 8y ago>"No because in the EU by legislation ISPs are forced to zero-rate all services in the same category. If they zero-rate Netflix they have to zero-rate YouTube and everything in between." Which is government regulation, which you claim to be against. Why not just enforce neutrality, eliminate the silliness that is zero rating, and offer reasonable data allowances instead?
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 8y ago> No because in the EU by legislation ISPs are forced to zero-rate all services in the same category. If they zero-rate Netflix they have to zero-rate YouTube and everything in between. You know what the technical term for that kind of legislation is, right? Yeah, you guessed it, that is net neutrality regulation! So, I suppose you are against this type of legislation then, correct?