3 ms·

Soap bubbles appear colourful in the sun in spite of low coherence because the soap film is thin. Soap films can be as thin as tens of nanometers meaning that l

Soap bubbles appear colourful in the sun in spite of low coherence because the soap film is thin. Soap films can be as thin as tens of nanometers meaning that light has to be only coherent for a femtosecond for interference to happen -- and this is very comparable to the cycle time of the light itself so that coherence is practically assured. But the round trip time in a 5mm window pane is 50 picoseconds, which is thousands of times larger making coherence important.

raverbashing 8y ago
Ah I see your point. I guess a similar thing happens when you look at plastic with polarized sunglasses, then you see different colors (though there's a chemical issue with plastic as well that affects the polarization of light) You could do a 5mm(+/-10nm) glass pane for it to reflect/absorb a specific wavelength but it would be hard.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- chopin 8y ago
  Most plastic sheets are birefringent due to the way they are produced. In the right circumstances, that can make a very colorful appearance when viewed in polarized light. As the difference in refraction index is normally rather small this works also for thicker sheets as no long coherence length is required for the effect to work. The effect should be strongest if you hold up the sheet to the clear sky with the sun behind you (the light coming from there is polarized horizontally). Sunglasses have the polarization vertically (to block exactly this light). As the birefringence turns the polarization the patch viewed through sheet becomes brighter. If you add in dispersion, you can get colored patches. It's the same effect mineralogists use with polarizing microscopes.
chopin 8y ago
Sunlight's coherence length is on the order of 5µm. If this weren't the case, reflection holograms wouldn't work in sunlight. 5 - 10 µm is the typical thickness of the holographic layer. If you want, a reflection hologram is a somewhat sophisticated soap bubble.
- dTal 8y ago
  In what sense does sunlight have any coherence length at all? I was under the impression that coherence length was essentially a function of how tightly controlled the wavelength is of a monochromatic source like a laser. Sunlight is completely incoherent.
  - drostie 8y ago
    I mean, the spectrum still has a width, it's just a very large width -- which is why the coherence time is very low. In a more abstract way, you're right that we are reaching for a metaphor here: if a frequency distribution is sharply peaked around one frequency then we can roughly say that the light "is that frequency" but then modify this by saying that the bits that are off-frequency, while they are "also that frequency," become "phase-incoherent" after a characteristic time or distance. That is not actually correct; they are simply different frequencies -- but it makes the interpretation easier. That metaphor begins to break down when you've got such a wide spread of frequencies: red light can only "pretend to be" blue light for a vanishing period of time. To put it more plainly, the phase-coherence time is the inverse of the spectral width in frequency-space; multiply it by $c$ to get a phase-coherence length. If you applied it to a truly monochromatic ideal source, you would find that the time and length are infinite -- it only makes sense for real distributions with normal spread. But that's all distributions, including blackbody distributions like sunlight -- it's just that those distributions have very large spread and therefore very low coherence lengths: but it's the same definition either way.
  - roesel 8y ago
    Coherence is defined as a correlation of the light with itself. In simpler terms "how similar it is to itself after letting it evolve for a bit". Sunlight has a lot of different wavelengths evolving in many different ways, therefore it is not too coherent compared to an ideal single wavelength laser which will be identical even after "evolving" for a while. However, if you look at sunlight at a certain time and then look at it one femtosecond later, the second look will still be similar to the first look to some extent, therefore you would have to say that the light is somewhat coherent. This is why sunlight is definitely NOT "completely incoherent".
JKCalhoun 8y ago
A fascinating read from 1890, "Soap Bubbles and the Forces Which Mould Them", C. V. Boys. Talks about colors in a film of soap (and a primer on scientific deduction and reasoning) : http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33370/33370-h/33370-h.htm http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33370/33370-h/33370-h.htm

raverbashing 8y ago

Ah I see your point. I guess a similar thing happens when you look at plastic with polarized sunglasses, then you see different colors (though there's a chemical issue with plastic as well that affects the polarization of light) You could do a 5mm(+/-10nm) glass pane for it to reflect/absorb a specific wavelength but it would be hard.

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
chopin 8y ago
Most plastic sheets are birefringent due to the way they are produced. In the right circumstances, that can make a very colorful appearance when viewed in polarized light. As the difference in refraction index is normally rather small this works also for thicker sheets as no long coherence length is required for the effect to work. The effect should be strongest if you hold up the sheet to the clear sky with the sun behind you (the light coming from there is polarized horizontally). Sunglasses have the polarization vertically (to block exactly this light). As the birefringence turns the polarization the patch viewed through sheet becomes brighter. If you add in dispersion, you can get colored patches. It's the same effect mineralogists use with polarizing microscopes.

chopin 8y ago

Sunlight's coherence length is on the order of 5µm. If this weren't the case, reflection holograms wouldn't work in sunlight. 5 - 10 µm is the typical thickness of the holographic layer. If you want, a reflection hologram is a somewhat sophisticated soap bubble.

dTal 8y ago
In what sense does sunlight have any coherence length at all? I was under the impression that coherence length was essentially a function of how tightly controlled the wavelength is of a monochromatic source like a laser. Sunlight is completely incoherent.
- drostie 8y ago
  I mean, the spectrum still has a width, it's just a very large width -- which is why the coherence time is very low. In a more abstract way, you're right that we are reaching for a metaphor here: if a frequency distribution is sharply peaked around one frequency then we can roughly say that the light "is that frequency" but then modify this by saying that the bits that are off-frequency, while they are "also that frequency," become "phase-incoherent" after a characteristic time or distance. That is not actually correct; they are simply different frequencies -- but it makes the interpretation easier. That metaphor begins to break down when you've got such a wide spread of frequencies: red light can only "pretend to be" blue light for a vanishing period of time. To put it more plainly, the phase-coherence time is the inverse of the spectral width in frequency-space; multiply it by $c$ to get a phase-coherence length. If you applied it to a truly monochromatic ideal source, you would find that the time and length are infinite -- it only makes sense for real distributions with normal spread. But that's all distributions, including blackbody distributions like sunlight -- it's just that those distributions have very large spread and therefore very low coherence lengths: but it's the same definition either way.
- roesel 8y ago
  Coherence is defined as a correlation of the light with itself. In simpler terms "how similar it is to itself after letting it evolve for a bit". Sunlight has a lot of different wavelengths evolving in many different ways, therefore it is not too coherent compared to an ideal single wavelength laser which will be identical even after "evolving" for a while. However, if you look at sunlight at a certain time and then look at it one femtosecond later, the second look will still be similar to the first look to some extent, therefore you would have to say that the light is somewhat coherent. This is why sunlight is definitely NOT "completely incoherent".

JKCalhoun 8y ago

A fascinating read from 1890, "Soap Bubbles and the Forces Which Mould Them", C. V. Boys. Talks about colors in a film of soap (and a primer on scientific deduction and reasoning) : http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33370/33370-h/33370-h.htm http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33370/33370-h/33370-h.htm