> None of your arguments make any sense when you take in account the fact that such business model has enormously benefited consumers. I think I already explai

> None of your arguments make any sense when you take in account the fact that such business model has enormously benefited consumers. I think I already explained my position pretty clearly, which is that consumers benefit from the free stuff less than they suffer from the monopoly subsidizing it. I'm happy to defend my position but you need to give me an argument of your own first, besides "it just doesn't make any sense".