3 ms·
OK, I've read the manuscript now. Very interesting work. I didn't realize this initially, but they are also saying that the transient phosphorylation of PGAM1 i
by carbocation 16y ago
OK, I've read the manuscript now. Very interesting work. I didn't realize this initially, but they are also saying that the transient phosphorylation of PGAM1 is a mechanism by which PEP is converted to pyruvate at a meaningful rate!
Reason for the exclamation point: the conversion of PEP -> pyruvate is is considered the last of 3 rate-limiting steps in glycolysis. They propose an end-run around this rate-limiting step. In their model, PEP donates its phosphate to PGAM1. Thus, PEP becomes pyruvate. Normally I wouldn't expect this to be a meaningful way to produce pyruvate--but their data appear to support the notion that PGAM1 becomes dephosphorylated at a high enough rate that this process can repeat itself fast enough to sustain pyruvate production. Oh, and phosphorylated PGAM1 isn't just a temporary phosphate holder--they hypothesize (relying on other studies) that it helps shunt carbons into biosynthetic pathways (which you need if you are a proliferating cancer).
It's not every day that someone figures out how living cells bypass a canonical rate-limiting step in the fundamental metabolic process shared by all living things.
- tptacek 16y agoPlease keep writing comments like these.
- noonespecial 16y agoIt took me about 20 minutes to google all of the terms in your response and figure out why this is really important, but I feel like I might actually get some of this this now and feel the excitement. Thanks for this as the paper itself was more or less unapproachable for me. Biohacking still seems to me like this great big unexplored space filled with new terms and exciting ideas that I'm just beginning to get acquainted with.