>had authorization for the spoofed number You didn't make this clarification in your first post. In the first two examples, they don't control the claimed numb

>had authorization for the spoofed number You didn't make this clarification in your first post. In the first two examples, they don't control the claimed number, which is what I was responding to. >I'm suggesting a fine on the carrier for unauthorized spoofing, which will force them to actually verify that there is authorization. This makes sense. Legitimate companies will get authorization agreements signed etc.