4 ms·
My guess is that they don't want to interfere with long-established procedures for wire-tapping (which probably pre-date 194). But perhaps the effect would be
by adrianratnapala 8y ago
My guess is that they don't want to interfere with long-established procedures for wire-tapping (which probably pre-date 194). But perhaps the effect would be what you suggest.
If so that's good because it is still an important difference that the govt merely orders service providers about rather than mandating that your own device work against you.
- afarrell 8y agoFor a high-level intro to wiretapping and the 4th amendment law around it, the Illustrated Guide to the Law is good: http://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=1704 http://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=1704