>Accusing somebody of refusing to have honest conversations and forcing their views on others is an accusation of immorality. No accusation need to be made. F

>Accusing somebody of refusing to have honest conversations and forcing their views on others is an accusation of immorality. No accusation need to be made. From how I understand it, the IDW was created because when there are attempts made to have honest conversations in other venues, they are actively destroyed. The point is to be able to have the conversations, not to condemn those who shut the conversations down elsewhere. If you see censorship and shutting down conversations instead of engaging rationally as immoral, that's a bit separate (although obviously closely related) issue from someone trying to create a place where such conversations can exist.