3 ms·
tl;dr for those who can't read the very light gray text or don't have time: - discredits the generosity of givers by calculating that they "likely" saved more
by ballenf 8y ago
tl;dr for those who can't read the very light gray text or don't have time:
- discredits the generosity of givers by calculating that they "likely" saved more in capital gains taxes than they gave away (and attacking them by forcing them to undergo a public audit or allow public to assume this to be true). [Responses highlight the absurdity of this claim.]
- they don't deserve credit because they accumulated their coins early on when it was easy/cheap
- the donated coins (and all cryptocurrencies apparently) are nothing more than an elaborate ponzi-pyramid scheme, therefore the donation merits no praise
- their true motivation, at least in part, was to align innocent charities with the crypto world, thereby corrupting their interests
- they should have liquidated the coins and given away the hard currency
- etc.