> Again, as an audience member in an obviously zero-sum debate, I'm extremely skeptical of the double-crux. For some context, double-cruxing came out of the ra

> Again, as an audience member in an obviously zero-sum debate, I'm extremely skeptical of the double-crux. For some context, double-cruxing came out of the rationalist community (specifically CFAR), which commonly refers to persuasive rhetoric as the dark arts. They do not develop tools for use in the dark arts.