2 ms·
> You should be rewarded since your productivity on assigned tasks will theoretically be significantly higher than your coworkers who are prioritizing e-mail an
by mbillie1 8y ago
> You should be rewarded since your productivity on assigned tasks will theoretically be significantly higher than your coworkers who are prioritizing e-mail and being constantly interrupted.
Sure, but lots of things _should_ be that are not. The reality is that the appearance of productivity (for example, habitually timely replies to emails) will impact your promotion/compensation more than your actual worth in many, many organizations.
- nlawalker 8y agoNah, it's that your definition of productivity differs from your organization's. This frequently happens with a lot of other concepts too, like "quality", "maintainability" and "security." Part of being employed is simply compromising with the organization on these things.
- mbillie1 8y ago> Part of being employed is simply compromising with the organization on these things. Since my definition is different from my employers, you say I should adopt their definition, and call this "compromise"? That's an interesting way to use that word.