12 ms·
4chan DDoS Takes Down MPAA and Anti-Piracy Websites
- some1else 16y agoRIAA and MPAA really need to come to their senses. They just can't buy more black hat firepower than disenchanted script kiddies will unleash against them for free. This is almost identical to the repercussions (having their websites defaced) of their attempts to pollute P2P networks with virus-infected seeds. They're really not good at this wannabe cyber-warfare game, and should be held responsible for misconduct, like any other netizen.
- schn 16y agoThe only way they can get out is to hire 4chan.
- DiabloD3 16y agoDear RIAA/MPAA, Although Anonymous is not your personal army, and when Jesus asked them their name, they replied "My name is Legion, for we are many", and by many, they mean over 9000; and they're also a front for the Marcab Confederacy.... They take large sums of unmarked, non-sequential large denomination bills, and don't skimp on the briefcase. Deliver it to moot's beachfront property in Mexico.
- armandososa 16y agoWhat? That totally sounds like the argument for a Quentin Tarantino movie.
- praptak 16y agoThey'd have to pay in lulz, of which they have none.
- philk 16y agoI might be missing something here but surely a web presence is not vital to either of these organizations, and while it might be satisfying to DDOS them it doesn't accomplish much. Also www.aiplex.com appears to be back up.
- naner 16y agoReminds me of the whole "refusing to be interrogated for entering my own country" incident. You're not sticking it to the man, you're sticking it to the low-level employee who is punching the clock for the man but doesn't actually have any say in steering procedure. And I guess that's fine if you want the publicity. But that's all you're going to get out of it.
- jrockway 16y agoThat was more interesting because nobody was really sure as to whether or not you had to answer those questions. Turns out you don't. This is silly, though, because there is little point in bringing down a website that nobody visits. If a tree falls in the forest...
- dekz 16y agoI believe to us it seems like a futile attempt, they should really target mail servers (which appear to be hosted by microsoft anyway). But to these not so tech-savvy people, I think it's enough to annoy them. They seem to be fighting fire with fire but the fire of DDoSing a torrent file server burns brighter.
- 16s 16y agoFor the young guys out there, you should know that DOS is illegal. If an individual is caught doing this, they could end-up in jail or in the least get a criminal record. So, if you want a decent job and to be a productive member of society, don't DOS websites. Your IP address is not anonymous.
- darrikmazey 16y agoAlso for the young kids: illegal is not always synonymous with immoral, and sometimes to be a productive member of society you have to step across that line.
- piguy314 16y agoIt's only illegal if you get caught, which will never happen if DDoS from behind 7 proxies!
- aw3c2 16y agoHow is DDOSing some websites productive? I would call appearing like immature bullies rather counter-productive if you fight for improving your rights.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- lewi 16y agoHe didn't say that, he was just stating a simple truth
- chrischen 16y agoDDoS or human flesh search would be morally acceptable IF there were no other recourse in society for justice. In china the government is authoritarian and the people have human flesh searches as their effective form of justice. But to condone illegal activity for change in places like the united states is to suggest that there is critical flaw in the democratic process. Is there? Because if there is then we should acknowledge that and fix that too instead of relying on mob rule all the time. The only person I can see who morally justifies this (for him/herself) would be some teenager who has never been allowed to vote (thus not having any other recourse for change). But I think its irresponsible to encourage these who must be kids to take the illegal route to get what they want if there is a viable legal route. Write your senator or something, don't cheer the mob on. Make sure you're not operating on impulse.
- alextgordon 16y agoOddly, while giving a tutorial on how to be a part of the DDoS, the article misses out the minor detail that it is in fact illegal.
- by 16y agoParticipating in a distributed denial of service attack is not necessarily illegal. There has to be some intent on the part of the visitor to cause damage. You could get involved in one just by innocently visiting a malicious web page which makes your browser download large files from the victim. Or suppose I set up an under-sized server with a very popular web application, the server might collapse under the load, but my visitors would not automatically become criminals when my server went down.
- alextgordon 16y agoMy comment was in the context of the article. I'd say firing up LOIC is plenty enough intent for it to be illegal.
- mkramlich 16y agoI don't know about the rest of you but I've thought about firing up LOIC just so I could say I fired up a Low-Orbit Ion Cannon. Who cares about DDoS-ing. :)
- eli 16y agoNo, if you innocently view a page on an underpowered server, you are not part of a denial of service attack and are, by definition, innocent. A Denial of Service attack is explicitly malicious.
- jonknee 16y agoA Distributed Denial of Service attack can be made up of a bunch of people innocently viewing a page on an underpowered server though. The people clicking on a link don't have to know they are part of an attack, even if the link was made expressly to bring a site down. A link on 4chan or any large website can easily bring down a site, especially if it's to a resource heavy page.
- c00p3r 16y agoLeave 4chan alone. Young freaks (and, oh, oldfags) have the same right to crowd together as everyone else. ^_^
- zf0fan 16y ago“Orakio -> #programming: I mean I hate scientology and I don’t need to be in some group called anonymous to express that hate.” – zf04 Same can apply with anti-piracy. Anonymous = noobs.
- pvg 16y agoWe target the bastard group that has thus far led this charge against our websites. [...] We have the manpower, we have the botnets, it’s time we do to them what they keep doing to us. What else, they stabbed us in the back? I know I'm breaking Godwin laws here but that's some pretty sickening Kristallnacht rhetoric there.
- paul9290 16y agoI think they need a new target. This would make more sense five or so years ago as these organizations have bended to the market. I can now for free use YouTube or vevo listen to any song I want either on my pc or thru their iPhone apps. Similarly use hulu , Justin TV or YouTube to watch for free mpaa content.
- armandososa 16y agoYeah, if you live in the United States. If I wanted to see, say, the Lost finale before it was spoiled to oblivion I had two options: a) BitTorrent it. b) Scream in agony.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- s810 16y agoAlso Sean Hannity's forum, but for some reason nobody noticed that. (it's back up now)
- lmaonade 16y agowe had efnet, they have 4chan kids will be kids