3 ms·

I agree completely with your assessment. I used to gripe about SfB, but Teams is hilariously bad. Off the top of my head: -200MB minimum memory usage whethe

I agree completely with your assessment. I used to gripe about SfB, but Teams is hilariously bad. Off the top of my head: -200MB minimum memory usage whether you use the desktop app or in a browser. Usually much more -Animated GIFs animate FOREVER with no way to turn them off, except by turning them off for everyone in your entire organization -Attachments fail constantly -Randomly takes over your SfB chats/calls -Can't have more than 19 people in a chat channel at once -Bots only work in the unintuitive, threaded "Teams" part that no one seems to grok, not the chat part that everyone actually uses However I do like the ability to add random onenotes etc to channels, and to be fair it has been getting better, albeit slowly

coredog64 8y ago
Add to that "crappy search" and "scrolling back through history results in long delays during which the entire display is blanked".
yakk0 8y ago
Teams does something much better than SfB. It keeps IMs in sync between clients and devices. If I reply to an IM on my phone in SfB it stays on my phone. There's no way to get that conversation history onto my desktop client. Teams acts like you would expect and all clients get all the history.
- StringyBob 8y ago
  Yes SfB's biggest problem is that it has skype in the name so people try to use it as an instant messenger. It's ok for audio/video, but an abomination for instant messages - almost spitefully bad for text based communication due to the way it randomly redirects messages within a conversation to e.g. Outlook.
Klathmon 8y ago
- Has their own poorly written markdown-WYSIWYG hibrid thing that often puts what i'm writing into some state where I need to clear out the whole message and start over. - Butchers 2-factor auth on mobile and often puts you into a neverending authentication loop (sending tens of text messages if your second factor is setup like that) - notifications that never clear unless you click on the channel, scroll to the "unread" message, and wait for a few seconds.

coredog64 8y ago

Add to that "crappy search" and "scrolling back through history results in long delays during which the entire display is blanked".

yakk0 8y ago

Teams does something much better than SfB. It keeps IMs in sync between clients and devices. If I reply to an IM on my phone in SfB it stays on my phone. There's no way to get that conversation history onto my desktop client. Teams acts like you would expect and all clients get all the history.

StringyBob 8y ago
Yes SfB's biggest problem is that it has skype in the name so people try to use it as an instant messenger. It's ok for audio/video, but an abomination for instant messages - almost spitefully bad for text based communication due to the way it randomly redirects messages within a conversation to e.g. Outlook.

Klathmon 8y ago

- Has their own poorly written markdown-WYSIWYG hibrid thing that often puts what i'm writing into some state where I need to clear out the whole message and start over. - Butchers 2-factor auth on mobile and often puts you into a neverending authentication loop (sending tens of text messages if your second factor is setup like that) - notifications that never clear unless you click on the channel, scroll to the "unread" message, and wait for a few seconds.