3 ms·
Your comment seems to be missing the point of the parent. It wasn't saying that adding this field was a good thing to do. In fact, it relies on the extra field
by wool_gather 8y ago
Your comment seems to be missing the point of the parent. It wasn't saying that adding this field was a good thing to do. In fact, it relies on the extra field being self-evidently ridiculous -- it was saying that there's no way to avoid doing something.
- tathougies 8y agoThe parent said any solution implemented within the language would be worse. Decades of experience with actual tagged unions would seem to indicate otherwise