5 ms·
My biggest complaint with plain html pages like this is that they're unpleasant to read on windscreen monitors. If you're publishing something like this, please
by traverseda 8y ago
My biggest complaint with plain html pages like this is that they're unpleasant to read on windscreen monitors. If you're publishing something like this, please consider adding "sakura css". It's designed to be tiny and to apply to plain html pages. They also have a bookmarklet.
https://github.com/oxalorg/sakura https://github.com/oxalorg/sakura
`<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/sakura.css/css/sakura.css" https://unpkg.com/sakura.css/css/sakura.css" type="text/css">`
- ams6110 8y agoReader mode handles sites like these perfectly, as well.
- dmm 8y agoYou try out stumpwm. It's a tiling window manager that allows you to take full advantage of your big screen. Simply entering "Control-t s" would vertically split your screen and make that unpleasantly wide page readable. Still too wide? No problem! Hit "C-t s" again and you get another vertical split. "c-t r" will undo the last split and "c-t q" will undo them all.
- namanyayg 8y agoMy trick: Hit Ctrl + Shift + I to bring up console on the right, then Ctrl "+" a few times to zoom-in. Takes me less than a second on the keyboard, and makes for a decent experience [1], in my opinion [1] https://i.imgur.com/CnbPq2F.png https://i.imgur.com/CnbPq2F.png
- Retric 8y agoYou don't need to view a page in full screen mode. Considering the site still works unchanged after 23 years I am really happy they did not design it for the 1995 era screens etc.
- greglindahl 8y agoAs the guy who formatted the page you're complaining about, all I can say is that it looked great when I formatted it. I tried sakura just now on a few of my 1990s webpages, and it trashes a lot of my list-and-table-based formatting. Maybe it works well for other pages, but not mine.