4 ms·
I'm not your typical JS/CSS hater but for this document, I found the lack of styling perfectly fine. It also works without problems on any mobile device I teste
by egeozcan 8y ago
I'm not your typical JS/CSS hater but for this document, I found the lack of styling perfectly fine. It also works without problems on any mobile device I tested (as expected). IMHO, not every page needs CSS and lots of breakpoints.
- kthartic 8y agoThe text covers the full width of my 27" monitor which, while readable, is not nearly as comfortable to read as text that doesn't.
- alejohausner 8y agoMake your browser window narrower.
- kthartic 8y agoThat's not a valid design decision. Car seats too small? Lose weight. Look, I realise now it's a site from 1994, I'm just astounded by the number of people that seem to think this design is still acceptable by today's standards and that I'm some sort of new-age hipster for suggesting otherwise.
- mixmastamyk 8y agoWhy is your browser maximized on a widescreen monitor?
- kthartic 8y agoWhy wouldn't it be? Yes, I certainly can reduce the width of my browser, but that's not the point. Bad design should not put the burden on the user to fix it.
- mixmastamyk 8y agoIt’s something a noob would do. The page was from ‘95, widescreen didn’t really exist, and free-flow was the best practice.