3 ms·
You don’t even need fancy static type checkers to avoid this. You literally just have to not have a null and not allow initialization of variables without value
by smadge 8y ago
You don’t even need fancy static type checkers to avoid this. You literally just have to not have a null and not allow initialization of variables without values. It is more work to add null to your language than to not have null.
- xamuel 8y ago>not allow initialization of variables without values Then you've thrown in the towel when it comes to optimality. Not saying this is necessarily bad (maybe you're inventing the next Python), but acknowledge this isn't really an acceptable option for the next C.