3 ms·
I think you nailed it (though I think Jeremy Ashkenas and Mike Bostock and that NYT group are brilliant... especially working in the media space at a company th
by 52-6F-62 9y ago
I think you nailed it (though I think Jeremy Ashkenas and Mike Bostock and that NYT group are brilliant... especially working in the media space at a company that doesn't encourage that kind of work to put it mildly).
I've had my whimsical entries into experimenting with Web Components, but they just haven't felt like they're quite there—ignoring the lack of support. They're workable, but I think design patterns surrounding current paradigms might need more readily addressed. As they are, you'd probably want a framework on top of Web Components to improve the semantics and just make working component state in generally less verbose.
I have a hastily-written example here playing with them:
https://robert-fairley.github.io/es6-webcomponents/ https://robert-fairley.github.io/es6-webcomponents/
(No repo, it's not worth it. Just check the source–it's short enough)