2 ms·
Your answer is 99% techno-marketing bullshit, but you still delivered the kernel of a credible explanation: systemd. It makes perfect sense now. cri-o, being "
by zapita 8y ago
Your answer is 99% techno-marketing bullshit, but you still delivered the kernel of a credible explanation: systemd.
It makes perfect sense now. cri-o, being "daemonless", reinforces the central role of systemd in orchestrating system resources, whereas containerd, being a daemon, weakens it. I can see how Red Hat architects would not love the idea, given the importance of systemd in the RHEL/Openshift stack.
Thanks for enlightening me, if only accidentally.
- davidmr 8y agoThere’s no call to be so rude. The RH/CoreOS people here are acting in good faith, I think they’re being exceptionally helpful, and they don’t even need to be answering questions at all.