4 ms·
I've always had this odd feeling that traffic is actually a Bernoulli flow, where instead of "pressure" you have congestion. eg if you have two lanes merging a
by paulmd 9y ago
I've always had this odd feeling that traffic is actually a Bernoulli flow, where instead of "pressure" you have congestion.
eg if you have two lanes merging and the system is at capacity, then the "pressure" across the streamline increases and traffic slows down as a result. And when you have very little pressure (or diverging arterial roads) traffic tends to speed up.
Of course there is a secondary problem of "phantom" traffic jams where the system is not really slowing down due to traffic merging or anything, you just have spots where traffic is not flowing at all for no real reason (the optimal solution being that everyone puts their foot on the gas and accelerates together). I suppose the physical analogue might be cavitation or non-laminar/turbulent flow?
I can't find any academic references on this but it's always made intuitive sense to me.
- lainga 9y agoThis is exactly why traffic regimes are sometimes described as "laminar" or "turbulent". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_diagram_of_traffic_flow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_diagram_of_traffic...
- yc-kraln 9y agoHere's one for you: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/tft/chap5.pdf https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/tf... I seem to remember a statistic that said, essentially, traffic waves propagate backwards at approximately 12mph. There are a set of circumstances where you can set up a "standing" wave of traffic where cars will have to tap their brakes at the same place for hours, for no reason.