3 ms·
Sure, and its revenue in 2012 was $128 million, and 2013 was $326 million. Suddenly paying $2.5 Billion in late 2014 starts to make some sense.
by ameister14 8y ago
Sure, and its revenue in 2012 was $128 million, and 2013 was $326 million.
Suddenly paying $2.5 Billion in late 2014 starts to make some sense.
- geezerjay 8y ago> Suddenly paying $2.5 Billion in late 2014 starts to make some sense. You mean expecting that a game that's already a half a dozen years old will keep increasing its revenue for a decade straight? Does that make any sense whatsoever?
- ameister14 8y agoNo, I mean expecting that a game of this type that has more than doubled in revenue for the past two years to continue to be profitable makes sense. As it turns out, this was an excellent bet, as their next quarters saw revenue increases in the hundreds of millions. Two years later, they continued to increase sales of the game, selling about 20 million copies in 2016. It worked.