4 ms·
I happen to like both. Why when one is awesome the other has to suck? You mentioned easy_install sucks because it doesn't have uninstall. I assume you haven't
by didip 16y ago
I happen to like both. Why when one is awesome the other has to suck?
You mentioned easy_install sucks because it doesn't have uninstall. I assume you haven't had problems with Rails gem initializers where production and development environment differs by quite a lot?
pip + virtualenv is as difficult/easy as rvm. They both solve the exact same problems.
When it comes to script/console, what's so hard about python -i your/boot/file.py?
I like rakefile, but i could also live without it by using plain ol' ruby file.
Haml, isn't that whitespace sensitive? Just kid... Sass on the other hand, would be awesome if it could solve multiple IE quirks for me. There's a sass equivalent in Python called CleverCSS, I wonder if it could solve my IE problems.
ActiveRecord, I fail to see how different it is compared to SQLAlchemy declarative mode. Aren't they solving the same problem? I would also add, I fail to see the difference between Sequel and SQLAlchemy. They both are also solving the same problem.
Cannot say much about FormBuilder, I like my form in html.
Layout, partials, helpers, (arbitrary functions, defining blocks in templates, etc etc) There are so many Python template engines that solved all of this problems again and again. From another angle, you don't really need Rails for this. Merb and Sinatra could provide such separations as well.
All and all, it's cool for you to express your happiness using Ruby. But why bash others?