7 ms·
And for a typical solar panel you’d get what, 50m? Are you also not convinced about solar tech in general? Being able to cheaply produce hydrogen generating pan
by talltimtom 8y ago
And for a typical solar panel you’d get what, 50m? Are you also not convinced about solar tech in general? Being able to cheaply produce hydrogen generating panels is a huge breakthrough, even if they do not yet have the efficiency or cost that would allow them to enter the market.
- stefan_ 8y agoWhy not do the math instead of rambling? A m^2 of buy it today solar can do 200 W, 3-4 hours at peak sunlight are ~700 Wh, enough to drive a Tesla 2 miles+.
- sveme 8y agoSono Motors [1] have plastered solar cells on the car body and claim that they could be able to cover 30 km of travel per day with them. Though even 10 km would be pretty helpful in a city, which is what your calculation implies (~4-5 m^2 usable surface area -> 10-15 km of additional distance). [1] https://sonomotors.com/ https://sonomotors.com/
- gregknicholson 8y agoOnce you get past the various brand names they've applied to their technology (just go to the FAQ page), this is essentially a self-charging car, which is really cool.
- cfontes 8y agoLooks really interesting, specially for european cities I think. But It's a pretty expensive deal, €16k for a car without the batteries (+€4k for them).
- endymi0n 8y agoWhy the snark? Let's do the math real quick - a square meter of photovoltaic panel will give you an averaged 4 kWh per day, which gives you around 80 grams of hydrogen via electrolysis. That gives you 8 km of driving a Mirai with current indirect technology. So whatever you're reading into my post, you're probably wrong (I'm a big advocate of green tech).
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- opencl 8y agoThese panels as-is have such a short lifespan you'd have to replace them on a daily basis, and the efficiency appears to be several orders of magnitude lower than PV, so this is not remotely close to being cheap. Maybe this line of research will lead to an actual usable technology a decade from now (and by then battery costs will have come down enough to make hydrogen make even less sense than it currently does), maybe it's a total dead end. It's certainly not a breakthrough right now.
- aquadrop 8y agoYes, being able to cheaply produce hydrogen generating panels is a huge breakthrough, but if they don't have efficiency or cost that means they can't cheaply produce hydrogen.
- taneq 8y agoUsing my rooftop solar setup as a source of real-world numbers... Depending on time of year, an average clear day gets me between 15kWh and 25kWh generated with 18 "typical solar panels" of 230W each. Call it 1kWh per panel as a pessimistic estimate. A Tesla Model S is quite heavy on the energy consumption because it's big and powerful. You'd expect around 0.2 kWh / km[1]. So if you're willing to go for a battery electric vehicle, a single rooftop panel could push it about 5km per day. [1] https://pushevs.com/2016/11/23/electric-cars-range-efficiency-comparison/ https://pushevs.com/2016/11/23/electric-cars-range-efficienc...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Retric 8y agoNo, 1m^2 @24% eff in a great location gives up to ~2kw per day (or more using very expensive panels or tracking). A Tesla get's 315 miles from 100kwh battery. So that 6.3 miles or 10,100 meters. In comparison to 0.36 it's ~28,000x as good. reply
- mojomark 8y agoI love solar, but this water splitting cell depletes over time (6 hr half life apparently) due to necessary oxidation, and must be refurbished or replaced. Your solar cell will in theory last indefinitly. Accounting for the energy input in the annealing step, I wonder shat the cumulative power balance looks like.