> I don't think that juries decide what's true and what's not. In a legal sense, that's exactly what they do. Juries are, by definition, deciders of fact, i.e

> I don't think that juries decide what's true and what's not. In a legal sense, that's exactly what they do. Juries are, by definition, deciders of fact, i.e. they decided what is legally true based on the evidence presented to them. Whether legal "truth," epistemological "truth," and physical "truth" coincide is an entirely separate (and largely pointless) issue.