>[Sam Harris] has defended the work of the social scientist Charles Murray, who argues that genetic differences may explain differences in average IQ across rac

>[Sam Harris] has defended the work of the social scientist Charles Murray, who argues that genetic differences may explain differences in average IQ across racial groups — while insisting that this does not make one group inferior to another. No, that is not what Charles Murray is arguing. Murray is arguing that some differences in average IQ are explained by genetics, and that does not make any particular individual inferior to another, because the distributions have a huge overlap. People should always be evaluated as individuals. It is endlessly horrifying that one is not allowed to make the banal statement that "identified populations have different medians on virtually every factor we can measure". Such statements about any other living creature are unremarkable, but making such statements about human beings? Heresy. Just ask Larry Summers.