2 ms·
It looks like there's a W3C draft "in the works" but I'm concerned since almost half the editors work for the two companies trying to pass this proprietary Azur
by swebs 8y ago
It looks like there's a W3C draft "in the works" but I'm concerned since almost half the editors work for the two companies trying to pass this proprietary Azure/AD vendor lock-in nonsense.
https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-webauthn-20180320 https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-webauthn-20180320
- ilikepi 8y agoYou may be comforted by the fact that the top three people on the Github contributor graph[1] are not from those two companies. I've skimmed some of the published meeting minutes[2], and JCJ (Mozilla) and JeffH (Paypal) seem to be highly involved. [1]: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/graphs/contributors https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/graphs/contributors [2]: https://www.w3.org/blog/webauthn/2018/01/11/meeting-minutes-2018/ https://www.w3.org/blog/webauthn/2018/01/11/meeting-minutes-... EDIT: add forgotten link
- colemickens 8y agoWhat is "this proprietary Azure/AD vendor lock-in" that you refer to? How is Azure AD more proprietary than AWS SSO, etc?