3 ms·
This size is much better, but I assume it lacks the "touch" protection against remote attacks, like the other ones? I still wonder about the exposed connector
by BartBoch 8y ago
This size is much better, but I assume it lacks the "touch" protection against remote attacks, like the other ones?
I still wonder about the exposed connector - what its durability. After all, I would like for such a tool to serve me for years fault-free.
- lovelettr 8y agoI personally have the nano version. > but I assume it lacks the "touch" protection against remote attacks It has the touch protection. There is a small strip of metal that protrudes beyond the USB port that you touch. > what its durability I've used it daily for about a year. Granted this is not "years" but so far it still feels very solid.
- BartBoch 8y agoSounds good then. I am ready to test one of them. Thanks!
- GordonS 8y agoForgive my ignorance, but could you explain what "touch" protection is please?
- chipperyman573 8y agoIn order for it to work you have to have it plugged in and touch it. Prevents a virus from talking to it unless it prompts you to touch it somehow.
- JeremyBanks 8y agoThey’re pretty sturdy. I’ve used my keychain version to pry off beer caps, and it’s gotten some scratches but works fine. The touch sensor is kind of annoying but it does work.