> The truth is that FSF is primarily a political organization. So what? That doesn't matter. What part of the FSF[0] or GNU[1] project suggests that abortion

> The truth is that FSF is primarily a political organization. So what? That doesn't matter. What part of the FSF[0] or GNU[1] project suggests that abortion is an issue relevant to their mission or goals? Why is abortion a software freedom issue? How about we say RMS does adopt it. Does that benefit the other stated goals of the organizations? How? What happens when the FSF runs a fund raiser, and they hear, "I'd love to give to your organization because I support free software ideals, but I can't because I disagree with your stance on abortion." Does that benefit free software? What happens when they're working with legislators on bills to re-enforce net neutrality, and the legislator says, "I'd love to help you on net neutrality, but I can't. My constituents are overwhelmingly pro-life, and I've gotten hundreds of voters contacting me since Fox News ran a piece on how your organization is pushing this bill to promote pro-choice laws. The National Right to Life and National Pro-Life Alliance have been calling to lobby against this bill as well. I'm sorry, but it seems that people think net neutrality is a pro-choice issue." Does that benefit free software? So, is the FSF and GNU willing to sacrifice their software freedom goals in order to further pro-choice goals? Should they be? 0: https://www.fsf.org/about/ https://www.fsf.org/about/ 1: https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.en.html https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.en.html