3 ms·
Might I suggest a little research, e.g., reading http://cs.unc.edu/~fabian/course_papers/PtacekNewsham98.pdf http://cs.unc.edu/~fabian/course_papers/PtacekNewsh
by wglb 9y ago
Might I suggest a little research, e.g., reading http://cs.unc.edu/~fabian/course_papers/PtacekNewsham98.pdf http://cs.unc.edu/~fabian/course_papers/PtacekNewsham98.pdf
This points out how WAF/NIDS is just a speed bump for a serious attacker.
You may conclude that they don't really 1) remove attack surface 2) Unclear if they really do this, and if they do what value there is 3) See the papers for detail on the differences 4) Zero cost to purchase, but what cost to maintain, run, keep up? 5) see #4 6) even if you have a large web farm?
This paper was writen 20 years ago.
- peterwwillis 9y agoI already addressed this. The WAF is a temporary solution. It is not targeted at "serious attackers", it is targeted at drive-by scans and generic exploits.