> but it's a community project and at some point the consensus will be that he is just wrong. No, that's just your prejudice talking. The consensus can just as

> but it's a community project and at some point the consensus will be that he is just wrong. No, that's just your prejudice talking. The consensus can just as well be that RMS has a point and that a lone maintainer has no legitimacy to dictate policy, let alone override executive decisions. RMS is the founder of many GNU projects and is also the president of the FSF. Just because some dude has access to a repository of a FSF project that doesn't give him the right to hijack the project to suit his fancy. It's a FSF project and the project's driving policy is set by the FSF.