3 ms·
For web logs specifically, even if you had a system that would 100% tell you what is a hack attempt and what isn't, you would probably not want to look at the o
by tgsovlerkhgsel 9y ago
For web logs specifically, even if you had a system that would 100% tell you what is a hack attempt and what isn't, you would probably not want to look at the output.
The web server will be hit by thousands of "hack attempts" a day. Most of them will be directed at software you don't even use.
You care about successful hacks, not random attempts (targeted attempts may be different, but good luck finding them in the noise of web logs). Web logs are probably the noisiest, least useful place to look for those (although they can be useful to determine how an attacker got in/where they came from after the fact).
The only thing that could make sense for web logs is looking for brute-force attempts, but that is better done with application-level logging (and countermeasures like CAPTCHAs).
Things you could look at instead are e.g. firewall/netflow logs: If your server is making unexpected outbound connections, there's a good chance it got owned and someone is now downloading their toolkit onto it.