The benefits of the doc is purely subjective (obviously) so asking what purpose it serves is a dick move. And it specifically says not to remove. RMS only obje

The benefits of the doc is purely subjective (obviously) so asking what purpose it serves is a dick move. And it specifically says not to remove. RMS only objected when they tried to introduce a change he specifically said not to remove. Calling this an unwarranted exercise in authority is also a dick move. It isn't even a code change. Let's talk priorities: glibc could see improvements preventing y2038 bugs and fuzzing, but we fret over a joke. Also there is no evidence that the joke could be traumatic to anyone.