3 ms·
Good question. It's the longest flights that are the most irritating, so the willing to pay may be higher. The example given on the Boom site of Los Angeles ->
by kartickv 8y ago
Good question. It's the longest flights that are the most irritating, so the willing to pay may be higher. The example given on the Boom site of Los Angeles -> Sydney becoming 7 hours instead of 15 is compelling.
- monort 8y agoThe reverse is true for me, I'd choose 15 hours in a flat-bed vs 7 hours in an ordinary seat.
- adrianratnapala 8y agoThere is a point here. I am so used to travelling to and from Australia, that I find flights less than 7 hours to be annoying. You go through all he hassle of getting onto the dang plane, but don't have time to experience your flight in a relaxed, enjoyable way.