> For the final decision-maker to actively step in and veto something the normal decision process already has consensus around, or just pre-emptively declare so

> For the final decision-maker to actively step in and veto something the normal decision process already has consensus around, or just pre-emptively declare something decided against what seems to be a consensus buliding the other way... is unthinkable for me. Especially on so trivial an issue. This is what RMS wants to throw his weight around for?