2 ms·
This[0] is relevant. He's possibly alienating only a group of vocal people. It isn't clear form the article that it's the consensus more than it is the consensu
by noobermin 9y ago
This[0] is relevant. He's possibly alienating only a group of vocal people. It isn't clear form the article that it's the consensus more than it is the consensus of people in an email thread.
After clicking around the mailing list, it looks more like what [0] suggests than it being a clear majority of contributors to glibc.
That said, alienating anyone could be problematic.
[0] https://lwn.net/Articles/753720/ https://lwn.net/Articles/753720/
- olliej 9y agoThat group being the maintainers?
- noobermin 9y agoI'll admit I'm not big into the who's who behind glibc, but I saw 4 or so people speak against it. Are those 4 the only main maintainers of glibc? Do you know?
- adrianratnapala 9y ago> That said, alienating anyone could be problematic. Heckler's vetoes are also bad for the public.