3 ms·
You mean they shouldn't have disabled the car's own autonomous, non AI braking system and kept it as a backup for when theirs failed? Yeah, but that would take
by mnm1 9y ago
You mean they shouldn't have disabled the car's own autonomous, non AI braking system and kept it as a backup for when theirs failed? Yeah, but that would take a responsible, caring player and we're talking about uber here, a company built on ignoring laws, best practices, and common sense. This can easily be a case of manslaughter, but their cozy relationship with the az government will probably prevent that from happening despite uber's egregious recklessness.
- digikata 9y ago> You mean they shouldn't have disabled the car's own autonomous, non AI braking system and kept it as a backup for when theirs failed? I admit that was a thought, but I'd hold back from to saying that simple specific thing was the missed item, or even if that was a realistic expectation to maintain that setup. Without a built up safety culture that looks at the issue from multiple directions in detail, and has the authority to halt testing if needed, then it could have easily been something else. And there are multiple industries from civil/military aviation, medical, architecture, as well as many industrial occupations from which one could have formed a safety framework upon.