4 ms·
That still doesn't explain what is faster, only how it's faster. Based on the GPU acceleration bit, I'd assume it's page rendering though.
by mrduncan 16y ago
That still doesn't explain what is faster, only how it's faster.
Based on the GPU acceleration bit, I'd assume it's page rendering though.
- pixelbath 16y ago"rapid advances in Chrome's 2D graphics performance" I'd assume it's the 2D graphics performance.
- _delirium 16y agoA very specific subset of 2d graphics performance it seems: 2d animation using certain kinds of transforms. Rendering large/complex SVGs isn't getting 60x faster.
- hackermom 16y agoAnd this is just one part of page rendering. This part may already be neglectable, representing fractions of a second, drowning in the parsing and structuring of the output done prior to actually rendering it. To me, all of this is just windbagging and vacuous marketing - just like the (almost entirely) pointless Javascript boasting.