2 ms·
Perhaps. But it’s not the relative importance of one thing vs the other which is most important. What is most important in the context of this conversation, i
by adamsea 8y ago
Perhaps.
But it’s not the relative importance of one thing vs the other which is most important.
What is most important in the context of this conversation, imho, is the case for the profound negative effects of poverty, United-States style, on an individuals growth and the (sometimes insurmountable) challenges it creates for that person.
And the reason that this matters is that poverty in a country such as the U.S. (and also many, if not most other countries) is the result of a series of political choices by people (social policy, etc) over time.
In over words, it’s a phenomenon which is, if not created entirely by, is definitely affected (increased or decreases) by human behavior.
Meaning it’s something we can change.
- tlarkworthy 8y agoBut these facts mean we are already more meritocratic than aristocratic. The relative importance of these factors define where we are in that spectrum. Being meritocratic is what we want I think. Sure, we are still a bit wealth biased, but that might actually be due to intelligence being hereditary not wealth being causal.