4 ms·
I'm sure they'll reconsider as soon as someone develops jet engines capable of mach 2.2 that don't burn fossil fuels. In the meantime, since speed is their goal
by TheOtherDave 8y ago
I'm sure they'll reconsider as soon as someone develops jet engines capable of mach 2.2 that don't burn fossil fuels. In the meantime, since speed is their goal, they don't have much choice.
- wbl 8y agoAnd doesn't spew a giant plume of radioactive gas while irradiating the passengers.
- reaperducer 8y agoThat's extra on United.
- robotresearcher 8y agoUnited could burn luggage for fuel. They're gonna lose it anyway.
- andygates 8y agoIf the thing needs to burn go-juice, give it green go-juice. Isn't biofuel-derived avgas a thing yet? Startup idea...