3 ms·

I kind of agree with you on this, but I don't think Spotify is a good example. It's not like the 1995 equivalent of Spotify was free unless you were pirating al

I kind of agree with you on this, but I don't think Spotify is a good example. It's not like the 1995 equivalent of Spotify was free unless you were pirating all of your music. Uber and Netflix are similar in that they replace taxis and cable TV respectively. Anyways, if you can, I'd suggest putting another paragraph above or below the graph in the article explaining what you've said in this comment. I did not get this point from reading the article and I think a lot of other people will also struggle with it.

sandrobfc 8y ago
Well, I don't think there's a good equivalent of Spotify in the 90s, people just bought or downloaded what they wanted to hear. My point is that now we have this "free" software that, sure, you can download for free, but you'll need to pay if you want to use all its features. I will provide an additional explanation in the text to clarify this part. Thanks for your feedback!