2 ms·
TFA specifically says the accounts were soleley in her name, she made the investments, and that it's possible he didn't even know about them.
by djrogers 9y ago
TFA specifically says the accounts were soleley in her name, she made the investments, and that it's possible he didn't even know about them.
- sidlls 9y agoI think the point of the comment you responded to is that she was able to do what you say primarily because she and her husband didn't need (most) of her income at all: it was (almost) entirely disposable.
- cascom 9y agoHer husband died over a decade ago - the accounts being in just her name is literally proof of nothing, if they maintained separate finances prior to his death in most cases the assets would all be re-titled in her name. For all we know her husband inherited $10m before he died, and she blew the difference in Vegas one weekend... My point is that there is a lot of speculation in this article and not much in the way of facts