3 ms·
> Is it any different conceptually than extending the handshake from analog modems to include the data? By "include the data" do you refer to the transmitted f
by ggerganov 8y ago
> Is it any different conceptually than extending the handshake from analog modems to include the data?
By "include the data" do you refer to the transmitted file itself being included in the sound? If yes - you can include the file in the sound, but the transmission will be too long, because transfer rate is very slow.
About what is heard as sound: <marker>{SDP data}. All peers initially listen for the <marker> because it is computationally cheaper. When the <marker> is received, then they start listening to the SDP data, which consumes more resources.
- AndrewKemendo 8y agoGlad I was hearing it correctly (generally). So based on what you write here, it sounds like it can only be one way - which makes sense given the architecture. I'd be curious if it could be made as a continuous two way connection - my guess is yes, but it would take FTDT or FDM to coordinate right?
- ggerganov 8y agoYes, it's one-way communication. I guess, extending to two-way can involve any of the practices used in modem communication. The biggest issue though would be dealing with the noise and making it reliable.