4 ms·

You might be piping its output into `head` or `more`.

• ajross 8y ago
  Exactly. Also it generally relies on every process everywhere to properly handle an error return from write(). If you launch a big pipe from the shell and just one stage goofs this up and keeps writing after error, the whole thing will stall until you Ctrl-C or otherwise manually kill the process group, which will wreck whatever result you were trying to get from the (already completed successfully!) "head" or "cut" or whatever. Basically it's a very sane robustness choice and one of the great ideas of classic unix. It's just surprising the first time you stumble over it.